![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:30 • Filed to: Yak | ![]() | ![]() |
This is what happens when the graphics department doesn’t know their airplanes.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:33 |
|
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:35 |
|
Is Charlotte’s airport abbreviation really CLT? That’s so unfortunate.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:36 |
|
As a pedant: sometimes what the project requires is an easily manipulated image source that fits the bill for the broader goal and for which any anomalies won’t be detected by 99% of the population.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:41 |
|
Yeah I totally understand but I’d think Yak-42 clip art would require some serious effort to find especially when compared to a 737.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:42 |
|
Oops
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:43 |
|
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:43 |
|
I was poring over the cities until I realized it was much simpler than that. How on earth did this get a greenlight? I mean, I know Frontier employs like 12 people, but at least 3 of them must have seen this.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:47 |
|
You’re not wrong about that haha
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:49 |
|
I think Bob Loblaw had the real answer above - something easy to change quickly that’s on hand. Alternative theory: they really like 70s soviet airplanes. Or Yaks in general.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 16:52 |
|
When I worked at an agency, this would warrant a serious reprimand (or worse). In-house, though, the aircraft are your core product and the art assets should be pretty well managed to not include things outside your fleet. If I had to guess, it was an agency mock-up that just accidentally made it to print without that key change.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 17:01 |
|
Except I think that Frontier only flies Airbus products. Of course, Frontier flying either a plane that Boeing stopped making 30+ years ago or a Yak-42 wouldn’t surprise me!
![]() 04/24/2017 at 17:07 |
|
Except that Frontier has been flying only Airbuses since 2005.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 17:26 |
|
Cool 727, bro.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 17:26 |
|
Correct. Frontier retired their last 737 in 2005.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 17:31 |
|
A yak, you say?
Here, we see both a widebody and a regional yak.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 17:36 |
|
Think you missed it... that ain’t no 727.
![]() 04/24/2017 at 17:46 |
|
I would think Frontier would already have a bunch of stock images of their own planes available on their intranet for this sort of thing. At least, that’s been the situation at every company where I’ve worked - photos of products, logos, facilities, etc. were all there for whatever department needed them.
![]() 04/25/2017 at 20:45 |
|
You’re right. That’s what I get for being picky. I’m stuck in the 1980s, still thinking they have 737-200s:
![]() 04/25/2017 at 20:47 |
|
Yeah I’m guessing one of the airports might have put this one together on their own, Frontier might not have gotten them a stock image before their deadline.
![]() 04/25/2017 at 20:48 |
|
Ha yeah apparently it’s still 1985 for me, and the 737-200s are still red and Frontier isn’t a terrible airline.